@NathanLazarus3 @paulkrugman @LRB I think you are right about this. But allow the construction as an argumentative device rather than

@NathanLazarus3 @paulkrugman @LRB I think you are right about this. But allow the construction as an argumentative device rather than as a truly deep appreciation of the subtly of PK’s position. What one really wants to say is "IS-LM Keynesian" … which would require even more explaining.

related posts